Failure of democracy in pakistan

Bring fact-checked results to the top of your browser search. Government and society In the newly independent Pakistan consisted of two distinct parts:

Failure of democracy in pakistan

Political aspects of IslamIslamismand Shura Deliberations of the Caliphatesmost notably the Rashidun Caliphate, were not democratic in the modern sense rather, decision-making power lay with a council of notable and trusted companions of Muhammad and representatives of different tribes most of them selected or elected within their tribes.

It can be viewed similar to how the prime minister is chosen in many nations. After the Rashidun Caliphs, later Caliphates during the Islamic Golden Age had a much lesser degree of democratic participation, but since "no one was superior to anyone else except on the basis of piety and virtue" in Islam, and following the example of Muhammad, later Islamic rulers often held public consultations with the people in their affairs.

Since the law came from the legal scholars, this prevented the Caliph from dictating legal results. Laws were decided based on the ijma consensus of the Ummah communitywhich was most often represented by the legal scholars.

Ali Khan argues that Islam is fully compatible with democracy. In his book, A Theory of Universal Democracy, Khan provides a critique of liberal democracy and secularism. He presents the concept of "fusion state" in which religion and state are fused.

There are no contradictions in God's universe, says Khan. Contradictions represent the limited knowledge that human beings have. According to the Quran and the SunnahMuslims are fully capable of preserving spirituality and self-rule.


Muslim democrats, including Ahmad Moussalli professor of political science at the American University of Beirutargue that concepts in the Quran point towards some form of democracy, or at least away from despotism. These concepts include shura consultationijma consensusal-hurriyya freedomal-huqquq al-shar'iyya legitimate rights.

For example, shura Al Imran — Quran 3: Government by the people is not therefore necessarily incompatible with the rule of Islam, whilst it has also been argued that rule by a religious authority is not the same as rule by a representative of God.

This viewpoint, however, is disputed by more traditional Muslims.

Constitutional framework

Moussalli argues that despotic Islamic governments have abused the Quranic concepts for their own ends: Much debate occurs on the subject of which Islamic traditions are fixed principles, and which are subject to democratic change, or other forms of modification in view of changing circumstances.

Some Muslims allude to an "Islamic" style of democracy which would recognize such distinctions. Shia viewpoint[ edit ] According to the Shia understanding, Muhammad named as his successor as leader, with Muhammad being the final prophethis son-in-law and cousin Ali. Therefore, the first three of the four elected "Rightly Guided" Caliphs recognized by Sunnis Ali being the fourthare considered usurpers, notwithstanding their having been "elected" through some sort of conciliar deliberation which the Shia do not accept as a representative of the Muslim society of that time.

The largest Shia grouping—the Twelvers branch—recognizes a series of Twelve Imamsthe last of which Muhammad al-Mahdithe Hidden Imam is still alive and the Shia are waiting for his reappearance. Since the revolution in Iranthe largest Shia country, Twelver Shia political thought has been dominated by that of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeinithe founder and leader of the revolution.

Khomeini argued that in the absence of the Hidden Imam and other divinely-appointed figures in whom ultimate political authority restsMuslims have not only the right, but also the obligation to establish an " Islamic state ". Khomeini distinguishes between Conventional Fiqh and Dynamic Fiqh, which he believes to also be necessary.

Khomeini divided the Islamic commandments or Ahkam into three branches: This list includes all commandments which relate to public affairs, such as constitutions, social securityinsurancebanklabour lawtaxation, elections, congressetc.

Some of these codes may not strictly or implicitly pointed out in the Quran and generally in the Sunnah, but should not violate any of the two, unless there is a collision of rules in which the more important one is given preference an apparent, but not inherent, violation of a rule.

The Islamic "government, which is a branch of the absolute governance of the Prophet of God, is among the primary ordinances of Islam, and has precedence over all 'secondary' ordinances. Were the powers of government to lie only within the framework of secondary divine decrees, the designation of the divine government and absolute deputed guardianship wilayat-i mutlaqa-yi mufawwada to the Prophet of Islam peace be upon him and his progeny would have been in practice entirely without meaning and content.

I must point out, the government which is a branch of the absolute governance of the Prophet of God is among the primary ordinances of Islam, and has precedence over all secondary ordinances such as prayer salatfasting sawmand pilgrimage hajj.

Failure of democracy in pakistan

Other deviations from strict sharia law have been noted in the largest Shia-majority state: Insurance is maintained even though chance, the very basis for insurance should theoretically be excluded from all contracts. The contracts signed with foreigners all accept the matter of interest.

Al-Farabi argued that the ideal state was the city-state of Medina when it was governed by Muhammad, as its head of stateas he was in direct communion with God whose law was revealed to him. In the absence of the prophet, Al-Farabi considered democracy as the closest to the ideal state, regarding the republican order of the Rashidun Caliphate as an example within early Muslim history.

However, he also maintained that it was from democracy that imperfect states emerged, noting how the republican order of the early Islamic Caliphate of the Rashidun caliphs was later replaced by a form of government resembling a monarchy under the Umayyad and Abbasid dynasties.The judgment in Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerala, whose 40th anniversary falls today, was crucial in upholding the supremacy of the Constitution and preventing authoritarian rule by a single.

The primary cause of failure of democracy in Pakistan is that democratically elected governments have not been allowed to function and to serve out their tenures, which in turn leads to a lack of strong democratic institutions.

Another cause may be low literacy rates amongst the masses.5/5(3). ] Pakistan is also the 5th largest and is also the largest Majoritarian democracy and (non-liberal) in the world and perhaps considered as the world's largest Islamic democracy within the Muslim world as opposed to a modern liberal democracy, such as modern Republic of Turkey, with its western orientated values.

The masses in Pakistan have only experienced the worsening of their misery and pain under this “democracy” of finance capital and free market economics. The genuine democracy of the workers and the toiling masses can only be accomplished by the overthrow of this yoke of dictatorship of the financial oligarchy.

The right and freedom As I explain here and here, I am a libertarian or a classic (18th century) liberal.I agree with liberals on things like domestic civil liberties, free speech, free private life, freedom of sexuality and freedom of religion (and freedom from religion)..

But I agree with conservatives on things like the economy, crime and foreign policy. Islamic democracy is a political ideology that seeks to apply Islamic principles to public policy within a democratic framework.

Islamic political theory specifies three basic features of an Islamic democracy: leaders must be elected by the people, subject to sharia, and committed to practicing "shura", which is Arabic for "consultation".The expression of Islamic democracy is different in.

Failure of Democracy in Pakistan - Sample Essays